| 1 |
Luca Barbato wrote: |
| 2 |
> Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:10:13 +0100 |
| 5 |
>> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>> Ok, that seems a fine definition of what an eapi is. Everybody agrees on it? |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>> Nope. EAPI (from my POV) defines the API that a package manager has to export |
| 11 |
>> to an ebuild/eclass. That includes syntax and semantics of exported and expected |
| 12 |
>> functions and variables (IOW the content of ebuilds/eclasses), but does not |
| 13 |
>> contain naming and versioning rules (as those impact cross-package relationships). |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> This restricted definition is ok for everybody? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> lu |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
Logical and proper to me. |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives