| 1 |
On Thursday 12 June 2008 18:14:21 Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> he was told to remove kdebuild-1 from the repo and this has yet to happen |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I just checked the April meeting log, and while I admit I didn't read every |
| 5 |
word from start to finish, all I could see was that kdebuild couldn't be in |
| 6 |
the final, official version. In particular, you yourself wrote: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
22:36 < vapier@> i generate the pms for reference. it better not include |
| 9 |
anything that hasnt been approved. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
It looks like that isn't the default in current git, but it's trivial to fix |
| 12 |
if that's what people want. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
If I missed something in the log, or if this was discussed somewhere else, |
| 15 |
please let me know. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> TeX isnt a format that integrates with Gentoo. should just convert it to |
| 18 |
> docbook and be done with this garbage. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I would think that anyone proposing such a disruptive change at this point |
| 21 |
should either give a damn good reason or do the work themselves, preferably |
| 22 |
both. I can't even figure out what "integrates with Gentoo" means, let alone |
| 23 |
decide whether it counts as "damn good". (And if you're suggesting DocBook |
| 24 |
as an alternative, it can't possibly mean "is the same as all the other |
| 25 |
Gentoo documentation".) |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives