| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Matt Turner schrieb: |
| 5 |
> Worse, users sometimes file bugs in our bugzilla that we don't have time |
| 6 |
> to respond to for a while during which time they're waiting on people |
| 7 |
> without the ability to help them. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Is there a better way of directing reporters to file bugs upstream? Of |
| 10 |
> course it's not always clear whether a bug is an ebuild bug or something |
| 11 |
> easily patched in Gentoo vs a driver bug that requires an upstream |
| 12 |
> developer... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I think such bug reports are still useful. They can point to patches once |
| 15 |
the issue has been resolved upstream, for consideration in a new ebuild |
| 16 |
revision. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Whether they are kept open or resolved UPSTREAM while an upstream fix is |
| 19 |
unavailable I have no strong opinion about. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Best regards, |
| 23 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
iEYEARECAAYFAlXjRHgACgkQ+gvH2voEPRCiLwCeNOZAIpEsXwCIsSV2ZzMwXxO4 |
| 28 |
gUkAnR+5nwYhL8ty5YR2QoISDe4y+B8Y |
| 29 |
=U/e0 |
| 30 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives