| 1 |
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:27:02 +0000 |
| 2 |
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 5 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> On 18-09-2011 12:59, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 8 |
> > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> |
| 9 |
> > wrote: |
| 10 |
> >> No, there isn't anything traumatic. The only thing systemd folks |
| 11 |
> >> are doing is nicely asking devs to include systemd unit files |
| 12 |
> >> whenever necessary or use the eclass whenever upstream supplies |
| 13 |
> >> those files. |
| 14 |
> >> |
| 15 |
> >> In other words, some devs just found themselves a scapegoat. |
| 16 |
> >> |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > ++ |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > I'm astonished by the large amount of misinformation that is being |
| 21 |
> > spread around about systemd. If this originated on the gentoo-user |
| 22 |
> > mailing list, I'm disappointed that Gentoo users wouldn't do some |
| 23 |
> > basic research. |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > I kind of expect this kind of trigger-happy FUD from websites like |
| 26 |
> > omgubuntu, but surely Gentoo folk are more mature. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> You mean that no Linux users, in particular anyone not running or not |
| 29 |
> wanting to run GNOME and Fedora, shouldn't be worried about the way |
| 30 |
> some people in the GNOME and Fedora community seem intent to impose |
| 31 |
> their ways to everyone else? Worse, in the process seeming to want to |
| 32 |
> convince everyone they found the panacea and that the "old unix ways" |
| 33 |
> that have been around for 40+ years are all obsolete and that we |
| 34 |
> should give in to "the collective"? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Could you give at least a single example instead of this 'blah blah |
| 37 |
blah, I don't like you'? It's much easier to discuss particular cases |
| 38 |
rather than 'they all make me feel sad'. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
Best regards, |
| 42 |
Michał Górny |
Archives