From: | Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Cc: | pacho@g.o, cron-bugs@g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? | ||
Date: | Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:34:09 | ||
Message-Id: | 20131210223346.48f484be@shanghai.paradoxon.rec | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? by Pacho Ramos |
1 | Am Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:55:05 +0100 |
2 | schrieb Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>: |
3 | |
4 | > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197625#c14 |
5 | > |
6 | > This has reminded me that maybe we should switch to cronie from |
7 | > vixie-cron as default and recommended cron provider in Handbook. Last |
8 | > time I checked, vixie-cron upstream was died while cronie forked it |
9 | > fixing some bugs :/ |
10 | > |
11 | > What do you think? |
12 | > |
13 | > |
14 | > |
15 | > |
16 | |
17 | +1 from me (as the package maintainer of cronie I cannot vote |
18 | differently here :P) |
19 | |
20 | -- |
21 | Lars Wendler |
22 | Gentoo package maintainer |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? | Jeff Horelick <jdhore@g.o> |