1 |
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 07:31:10PM +1300, Alistair Bush wrote: |
2 |
> > On Saturday 27 of March 2010 21:58:41 William Hubbs wrote: |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > It's really freaking silly to wait months for stabilization of some random |
5 |
> > php/perl library that's known to work. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Have you ever just considered closing the stabilization bug and ignoring the |
8 |
> arch. If they take so long to mark your packages as stable why do you care |
9 |
> about them enough to even attempt to stabilize anything on their arch. |
10 |
|
11 |
If the pkg isn't a leaf node, you wind up keeping older and older |
12 |
versions lingering across multiple pkgs to keep it from breaking |
13 |
stable. |
14 |
|
15 |
This is assuming that it's still heavily frowned upon to remove the |
16 |
only stable version available for a non-dead arch... |
17 |
~harring |