Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:01:49
Message-Id: CAEdQ38HkMgFhAkpx09Y75ojJYjWAJaLHu4jtkftqrTLE9Ow2sA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
2 > 2. Arches were Git repos are too heavy (Kumba wanted this for MIPS)
3
4 Please don't go to this trouble for the ability to commit to portage
5 on *really* slow systems.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o>