Archives
Archives
| From: | Richard Yao <ryao@×××××××××××××.edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | "gentoo-dev@l.g.o" <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> |
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] preserve_old_lib and I'm even more lazy |
| Date: | Sat, 25 Feb 2012 00:31:55 |
| Message-Id: | CABDyM6Tm5rCE1PNLh4t4NCgJUvVU-Brvsg9xak-LWEUkeBtL9A@mail.gmail.com |
| 1 | > Am I the only paranoid person who moves them rather than unlinking |
| 2 | > them? Oh, if only btrfs were stable... |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Is this a reference to snapshots? You can use ZFS for those. The |
| 5 | kernel modules are only available in the form of 9999 ebuilds right |
| 6 | now, but they your data should be safe unless you go out of your way |
| 7 | to break things (e.g. putting the ZIL/SLOG on a tmpfs). Alternatively, |
| 8 | there is XFS, which I believe also supports snapshots. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] preserve_old_lib and I'm even more lazy | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] preserve_old_lib and I'm even more lazy | Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> |