| 1 |
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:35 AM James Le Cuirot <chewi@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 24 April 2022 23:48:34 BST, Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> >On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 3:14 PM James Le Cuirot <chewi@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> |
| 6 |
> >> On Sat, 2022-04-02 at 21:35 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> > # Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> (2022-03-27) |
| 8 |
> >> > # Dead package. Homepage doesn't resolve. Unmaintained in Gentoo for at |
| 9 |
> >> > # least 6 years. |
| 10 |
> >> > # Removal on 2022-05-02 |
| 11 |
> >> > app-pda/gtkpod |
| 12 |
> >> |
| 13 |
> >> Last rites has been cancelled. I'm taking over as maintainer. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> >Okay, but are you doing the thing I asked? |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> >> If you can break the dependence on anjuta (which I didn't |
| 18 |
> >> investigate), I'd have no problem keeping it. Would be nice to have an |
| 19 |
> >> actual maintainer as well. |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> >No, you didn't: |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> >https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/d347eab546/output.html#app-pda/gtkpod |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> >:( |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Sorry, it was last thing at night and I hadn't noticed the keyword situation. I think Anjuta is a key dependency and can't be dropped. I'll take it if necessary. Maybe I'll strip it down. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I don't think this is going to be a workable solution. Maybe you |
| 30 |
should take gtkpod into your overlay instead. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
What's so frustrating is that these are the kinds of things you had |
| 33 |
time to investigate in the weeks before you unmasked the package. This |
| 34 |
is really not how this is supposed to work. |
Archives