1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
On 6/28/06, Mivz <mivz@×××××××××××××.net> wrote: |
4 |
> Hello, |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I have just read the following story, which scared me a bit: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/06/23/1728205&tid=150 |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Does this obligation, to provide your own source, also count for a none |
11 |
> Gentoo developer making a overlay tree for one of his projects which is |
12 |
> licensed under de GPL-2? Because that is a derived distro form Gentoo |
13 |
> right? |
14 |
> Would that mean that, if u write software using the portage system, that |
15 |
> every package that is used by one of your own should be available from a |
16 |
> server of your own? |
17 |
> If, the developer should also provide it's own file server with all |
18 |
> those packages, this would cause that every developer that wanted to |
19 |
> make a overlay should be a Gentoo file mirror? |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Do my senses run wilde? Your just my imagination? |
22 |
> Do I understand this right? |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Mivz |
25 |
|
26 |
Questions on how the law affects Gentoo are best put to the Gentoo |
27 |
Trustees, who have access to our lawyers. They're the only people who |
28 |
should be commenting on legal stuff like this. |
29 |
|
30 |
Best regards, |
31 |
Stu |
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |