Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process | ||
| Date: | Thu, 29 Dec 2016 17:24:14 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20161229172358.3e969962@snowblower | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process by Marc Schiffbauer |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 13:28:12 +0100 |
| 2 | Marc Schiffbauer <mschiff@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > "atom" is a well defined term in the gentoo world, so why not use it? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Because it isn't... Are set names atoms? Are package names without an |
| 6 | associated category atoms? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process | Marc Schiffbauer <mschiff@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process | Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> |