| 1 |
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 10:15:35PM -0400, Lina Pezzella wrote: |
| 2 |
> Two topics: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> 1) possibility of creating a 'carbon' use flag |
| 5 |
> 2) creation of a baselayout virtual. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Currently, the baselayout package is fairly linux-specific. It does |
| 8 |
> contain files such as runscript.sh, that are needed for projects such as |
| 9 |
> MacOS and BSD. The suggestion here is to create a baselayout virtual so |
| 10 |
> that we can keep separate baselayout packages. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Any input/suggestions on these two subjects would be greatly appreciated. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I'd like to see baselayout and rc-scripts separated. This would at least |
| 15 |
address the runscript.sh issue. Secondly, the rc-scripts doesn't need to |
| 16 |
married to the baselayout. Separating sysvinit from baselayout is another |
| 17 |
good step, which has happened already. In order to get rc-scripts |
| 18 |
separated, we probably need to separate the basic config files in /etc |
| 19 |
(not /etc/init.d or /etc/conf.d) and package them with baselayout. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Would this eliminate the need for a baselayout virtual? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-Cory |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives