| 1 |
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 01:23:59 Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> If it wasn't for implicit system dependencies, the system set and its |
| 3 |
> dependencies wouldn't need this kind of special treatment. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
if it wasn't for implicit system dependencies, we'd have significant bloat in |
| 6 |
the tree and circular deps out the wazoo |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
there's absolutely no reason every package should depend on sh, find, gawk, ls, |
| 9 |
sed, grep, make, gcc, libc, as/ld |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
i wouldn't mind seeing gzip/bzip2/xz being auto calculated from SRC_URI ... |
| 12 |
though it would make a system without any of those tricky to bootstrap, so |
| 13 |
we'd have to pick at least one |
| 14 |
-mike |
Archives