| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:00:14 -0700 Joshua Baergen |
| 3 |
> <joshuabaergen@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | To be clear here: nothing will be broken. Xorg 7.0 will just not |
| 5 |
> | provide virtual/x11 (and in fact blocks it), so there will be issues |
| 6 |
> | with blocks showing up due to the upgrade path. Avoiding the upgrade |
| 7 |
> | (and blockage) is very easy if necessary (eg, you use 200 unported |
| 8 |
> | packages or something). |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> That is exactly the issue. Your average ~arch user is going to get |
| 11 |
> pages and pages of nasty red incomprehensible blocks simply because |
| 12 |
> you're making Xorg 7 block the virtual rather than provide it. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Where are you getting this idea of pages and pages? Your previous |
| 15 |
statement was that the average ~arch users would likely have a couple of |
| 16 |
unported apps. Unless they're using 1-line terminals, this just doesn't |
| 17 |
translate to "pages and pages" for me. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Thanks, |
| 20 |
Donnie |
Archives