From: | Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo | ||
Date: | Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:19:05 | ||
Message-Id: | 20100824191856.1f12800b@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo by Joshua Saddler |
1 | Hi, |
2 | |
3 | Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@g.o>: |
4 | > The big issue with the docs is that IF OpenRC/baselayout-2 are marked |
5 | > stable, it will require massive changes to hundreds of our other doc |
6 | > files. |
7 | |
8 | Is there a list of the needed changes? |
9 | |
10 | V-Li |
11 | |
12 | -- |
13 | Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
14 | <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
15 | |
16 | <URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/> |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo | Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@g.o> |