| 1 |
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:55:08 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:35:21 +0200 |
| 5 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Could you point me to at least a single program not supporting dots |
| 7 |
> > in useflags? My quick check shows that all PMs handle them well, |
| 8 |
> > quse and euse as well. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Hrm, it's rather disappointing that they're accepted everywhere. That |
| 11 |
> really shouldn't happen... My excuse for Paludis is that I never quite |
| 12 |
> got around to passing in additional flags to validation of names, and |
| 13 |
> dots are legal in exheres-0, so they're currently accepted everywhere. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
And may I remind you that lately you deliberately changed PMS for all |
| 16 |
EAPIs to satisfy invalid paludis behavior? And you knew that it caused |
| 17 |
actual breakages. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Best regards, |
| 21 |
Michał Górny |
Archives