1 |
On Monday 24 September 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
2 |
> Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>: |
3 |
> > On 09:58 Mon 24 Sep , Christian Faulhammer (opfer) wrote: |
4 |
> > > opfer 07/09/24 09:58:29 |
5 |
> > > |
6 |
> > > Modified: ChangeLog |
7 |
> > > Added: magicpoint-1.12a.ebuild |
8 |
> > > Log: |
9 |
> > > version bump, a lot of bugfixes; on Gentoo side we have better |
10 |
> > > Emacs support; in total fixing bugs 150312, 83313 and 186754 |
11 |
> > > (Portage version: 2.1.3.9) |
12 |
> > > |
13 |
> > > # no parallel make possible! |
14 |
> > > make -j1 Makefiles || die "emake failed" |
15 |
> > > make clean || die "emake clean failed" |
16 |
> > > make BINDIR=/usr/bin LIBDIR=/etc/X11 || die "emake failed" |
17 |
> |
18 |
> [...] |
19 |
> |
20 |
> > > make \ |
21 |
> |
22 |
> [...] |
23 |
> |
24 |
> > > make \ |
25 |
> |
26 |
> [...] |
27 |
> |
28 |
> > Why not emake for all of these? |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Because it fails, magicpoint's build system is really old and weird. |
31 |
> The comment above should state that, but the leftover -j1 I tried would |
32 |
> confuse the reader. Plus the stupid die comments. |
33 |
|
34 |
most people associate "emake" with "run in parallel" when in reality, that is |
35 |
merely one of the things it provides |
36 |
|
37 |
if something doesnt work in parallel, you use `emake -j1` ... using `make` |
38 |
generally doesnt make sense anywhere |
39 |
-mike |