Archives
Archives
| From: | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] rfc: why are we still distributing the portage tree via rsync? |
| Date: | Tue, 03 Jul 2018 15:22:45 |
| Message-Id: | 20180703152235.GA21405@linux1.home |
| 1 | All, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Mostly because of the recent "trustless infrastructure" thread, I am |
| 4 | wondering why we are still distributing the portage tree primarily |
| 5 | via rsync instead of git? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Can someone educate me on that, and is it worth considering moving away |
| 8 | from rsync distribution? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Thanks, |
| 11 | |
| 12 | William |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: why are we still distributing the portage tree via rsync? | Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: why are we still distributing the portage tree via rsync? | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |