Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! | ||
| Date: | Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:56:41 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4F60E9C1.7050600@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! by Maxim Kammerer |
||
| 1 | On 03/14/2012 11:36 AM, Maxim Kammerer wrote: |
| 2 | > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 19:58, Matthew Summers |
| 3 | > <quantumsummers@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 | >> Why is an in-kernel initramfs so bad anyway? I am baffled. Its quite |
| 5 | >> nice to have a minimal recovery env in case mounting fails, etc, etc, |
| 6 | >> etc. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > There is nothing bad about initramfs. I think that you are misreading |
| 9 | > the arguments above. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Whatever the arguments may be, the whole discussion boils down to the |
| 12 | fact that the only people who seem to have a "problem" are those that |
| 13 | have a separate /usr partition and simultaneously refuse to use an |
| 14 | initramfs. |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | Thanks, |
| 17 | Zac |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! | Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! | David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! | Richard Yao <ryao@×××××××××××××.edu> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! | Joshua Kinard <kumba@g.o> |