1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
3 |
|
4 |
Friends, |
5 |
|
6 |
Michał has documented the shortcomings of dynamic deps in our wiki[0]. |
7 |
(Thank you!) This documentation also includes two of our possible |
8 |
solutions. |
9 |
|
10 |
1. Improve dynamic-deps. This is, as Michał pointed out earlier in |
11 |
this thread a pipe dream. |
12 |
|
13 |
2. Remove dynamic-deps. This is what I think currently makes sense. |
14 |
|
15 |
3. This is undocumented in the Wiki, but it is certainly an option: do |
16 |
nothing. It is of course the worst option; but it is perhaps the most |
17 |
probably course of action as well... |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
dynamic-deps do not work, and nobody is stepping up to fix them. PMS |
21 |
defines a static dependency model, and this is what other package |
22 |
managers use as far as I know. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
Julian, |
26 |
|
27 |
would you like to share your experiences with Paludis? My guess is |
28 |
that Paludis is more predictable in this respect. I.e., instead of |
29 |
breaking stuff, I expect Paludis to simply give up. |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
Sebastian, |
33 |
|
34 |
I CC'd you because I would love to hear your opinion on this. |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
Trofi, |
38 |
|
39 |
please share your opinion too! |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
To sum up: My vote is disable dynamic-deps. And I would be happy to |
44 |
apply a patch that does this with the information I have today. |
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
[0] <https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Portage/Dynamic_dependencies> |
48 |
- -- |
49 |
Alexander |
50 |
bernalex@g.o |
51 |
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander |
52 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
53 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
54 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
55 |
|
56 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlPNi7oACgkQRtClrXBQc7UP6gEAnnWR7L7hDqvaL64ygDwqaBV/ |
57 |
4upsbo6z2FJK4BehajgA/30wolmft/L9vTR/RzH9Wlsu6+NoUBTBMeJGNuIdBCIl |
58 |
=++4v |
59 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |