| 1 |
But, anyway, I think, /var/repositories/gentoo is very very nice idea ;) |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
19.12.2012 03:03, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina пишет: |
| 4 |
> On 12/18/2012 02:49 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: |
| 5 |
>> On 12/18/2012 01:38 PM, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> On 12/17/2012 02:19 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>> Currently we put portage into /usr/portage and all related stuff is to |
| 8 |
>>>> be in the subfolders there (distfiles, binpkg). |
| 9 |
>>>> |
| 10 |
>>>> I've always myself override these defaults in make.conf to point for |
| 11 |
>>>> /var/portage/ (not /var/lib because I never bothered enough how to |
| 12 |
>>>> make world and config files to be put elsewhere :P). |
| 13 |
>>>> |
| 14 |
>>>> The only reason why we have this currently in usr is that bsd ports |
| 15 |
>>>> put their stuff in there and I suppose Daniel just did the same. |
| 16 |
>>>> |
| 17 |
>>>> With respect to reality how stuff is done in the linux land all the |
| 18 |
>>>> variable data should be in /var so we should adjust and move it in |
| 19 |
>>>> there too. |
| 20 |
>>>> |
| 21 |
>>>> What would you think? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
>>> I like the idea. As noted in bug #378603 [1], I'd like the portage |
| 24 |
>>> ebuild to ensure that the locations don't unexpectedly change for |
| 25 |
>>> existing installs. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
>>> Will it break catalyst? If so, we might begin the migration by fixing |
| 28 |
>>> catalyst and having to set the new default locations in the make.conf |
| 29 |
>>> that it generates. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
>>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378603#c1 |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
>> Yes, it will break catalyst. However, if the folder that the portage |
| 34 |
>> tree goes in is still something/something/portage then it shouldn't be |
| 35 |
>> hard to fix. |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> It should probably be mentioned (since most of us don't use the |
| 38 |
> snapshots every day) that the snapshots actually contain a folder called |
| 39 |
> "portage" in the tarball. Not that it would be impossible to change, |
| 40 |
> but if we migrate from /usr/portage to /var/whatever/portage then the |
| 41 |
> changes are trivial, if we migrate to /var/repositories/gentoo that |
| 42 |
> makes things like unpacking the snapshots significantly non-trivial. |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> I really don't care what everyone wants to do here (although I'm |
| 45 |
> generally for sticking closer to FHS), but I warn that if the path |
| 46 |
> doesn't end in "portage" the changes are going to be significantly |
| 47 |
> non-trivial. |
| 48 |
> |
| 49 |
> Thanks, |
| 50 |
> Zero |
| 51 |
> |
| 52 |
>> -ZC |
| 53 |
> |
| 54 |
> |
| 55 |
> |
Archives