| 1 |
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:54:52 +0100 |
| 2 |
"Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Am Donnerstag, 28. März 2013, 19:15:59 schrieb Michał Górny: |
| 4 |
> > Hello, |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > As discussed with ulm, I'd like to start a thread for collecting |
| 7 |
> > initial items for EAPI 6. Preferably items which are either almost |
| 8 |
> > ready or are easy to implement and are non-controversial. In other |
| 9 |
> > words, thing which are practically ready to get on the actual list. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > As usual, each item should have a corresponding 'Future EAPI' bug |
| 12 |
> > which blocks the tracker [1]. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > [1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=future-eapi |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> IUSE_RUNTIME support. Please. |
| 18 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?idB4283 |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Without a reference implementation, and experience of how it works in |
| 21 |
practice? No chance. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
We have both of these for 'suggested' dependencies, if you prefer. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives