| 1 |
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:41 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> All, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> We got a request from Debian to rename the "rc" binary of OpenRC due to |
| 6 |
> a naming conflict they have. They have a port of the at&t plan 9 shell, |
| 7 |
> which has a binary named "rc" as well[1]. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> My thought is to rename our "rc" to "openrc", since that would be |
| 10 |
> unique. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I know at least one thing that will break is everyone's inittab, so |
| 13 |
> should I sed their inittab in our live ebuild or expect them to fix it |
| 14 |
> and give a warning? I know that once OpenRC with this change is |
| 15 |
> released, it will need to probably be p.masked until there is a new |
| 16 |
> release of sysvinit that updates the inittab. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I'm not sure what else will break. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Does anyone have any ideas wrt other things to look for, or should I |
| 21 |
> make the changes upstream and have people let us know what |
| 22 |
> else breaks? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
are you going to rename also rc-service and rc-update? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> William |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493958 |
Archives