| 1 |
Yeah, I missed the context! I was not thinking about an ebuild. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> From: Joshua Jackson <tsunam@g.o> |
| 5 |
> Date: 2006/06/16 Fri PM 03:31:32 EDT |
| 6 |
> To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
| 7 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] using specific gcc-version in ebuild |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 10 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Forcing a change in your gcc version for compiling is less then |
| 13 |
> optimal. I don't believe the eclass has anything in it that will help |
| 14 |
> in what you are trying to do. I would probably do a pkg_setup with a |
| 15 |
> check for the version of gcc if it isn't a 3.* version then you exit |
| 16 |
> building and give the reason for this...This would probably be the |
| 17 |
> best way to do it, at this point. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> brettholcomb@×××××××××.net wrote: |
| 20 |
> > What about gcc-config - will that work? |
| 21 |
> >> From: Sven Köhler <skoehler@×××.de> Date: 2006/06/16 Fri PM |
| 22 |
> >> 03:10:08 EDT To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o Subject: |
| 23 |
> >> [gentoo-dev] using specific gcc-version in ebuild |
| 24 |
> >> |
| 25 |
> >> |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 31 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> iD8DBQFEkwcUSENan+PfizARAjLdAJ9u6zhasuWe4AT5x3+rcOAMlgqovwCeLPNf |
| 34 |
> NLU57K0Bl7uuneLhujKRLck= |
| 35 |
> =nSTb |
| 36 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> -- |
| 39 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives