| 1 |
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 07:44:01AM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 03/08/2017 01:27 AM, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:38 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:13:38PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> If all dev-go libraries wind up in RDEPEND solely to force rebuilds on |
| 6 |
> >>> upgrades, why not do the same with the standard library (dev-lang/go)? |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >> They should not end up in rdepend at all since we only need them at |
| 9 |
> >> build-time. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Shouldn't we get rebuilds when the dev-go libraries are upgraded too? |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> That's what I was getting at. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Another reading of the PMS reminds me (as Kent pointed out) that |
| 17 |
> slot-operator deps shouldn't be used for would-be-nice stuff. It says |
| 18 |
> specifically that := "indicates that the package will break..." |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Another option is to not force thisand rely on everyone to use |
| 21 |
--with-bdeps=y to make the rebuild happen. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I'm not sure whether this is a good idea, but it makes sense in a way |
| 24 |
since we are talking about build-time dependencies. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
William |
Archives