| 1 |
> In the past when smaller arches were not that active we used to mark |
| 2 |
> Java packages stable after testing by at least one arch team. The |
| 3 |
> probability to find arch specific issues in something like Java is not |
| 4 |
> so high so I think arrangements like this are acceptable when the arch |
| 5 |
> teams have problems keeping up. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
I do know that for Java stuff, I certainly wouldn't mind if the Java |
| 8 |
team marked for ppc/ppc64. The only thing that I'd need to know is that |
| 9 |
it was tested with the IBM JVM since there certainly are differences |
| 10 |
between that and the Sun one most people use on x86/amd64 and we've seen |
| 11 |
issues in the past. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-Joe |
Archives