1 |
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 23:25 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Hi all, |
6 |
> |
7 |
> app-accessibility/festival has not done a release upstream in some time. |
8 |
|
9 |
Does not look like they have declared it dead however. |
10 |
|
11 |
> We currently have several bugs against this package, including one |
12 |
> security bug. |
13 |
|
14 |
I attached a patch to the security bug for you guys. |
15 |
|
16 |
> Since a lot of blind people are now using espeak as their software |
17 |
> speech synthesizer, and the new version of emacspeak (version 26, which |
18 |
> will be in portage pretty soon) can support espeak, I would like to know |
19 |
> this. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Once emacspeak 26 is in the tree, I would like to move festival out of |
22 |
> accessibility, or remove it from the tree. |
23 |
|
24 |
One thing to note here is that espeak is only marked stable on amd64 |
25 |
while festival is marked stable on mips ppc amd64 ppc64 sparc |
26 |
ia64 alpha hppa x86. Removing it from the tree does not seem like |
27 |
an ideal alternative any time soon. |
28 |
|
29 |
> If there is a reason to keep festival in the tree, |
30 |
> can someone please contact me and take over the package? |
31 |
|
32 |
I don't want to take it over. But I've used festival and friends often |
33 |
in the past for lazy reading days. I know it's also used supported |
34 |
by asterisk and a few other programs. |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |