1 |
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:24:33 +0100 |
2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Can we all agree to just stop this and just restrict the arguing to |
5 |
> being between SDEPEND and DEPENDENCIES? Cheers. |
6 |
|
7 |
I clearly favour going with SDEPEND now as this fits better what people |
8 |
are used to and the move to DEPENDENCIES is also a chance to clean up |
9 |
dep-specs after we added all quirks we need(*). Let's name GLEP 54 here |
10 |
which we hopefully can add to EAPI 6. |
11 |
|
12 |
(*) or for when we run out of special chars ;) |