| 1 |
begin quote |
| 2 |
On Fri, 24 May 2002 07:06:35 +0200 |
| 3 |
Bjarke Sørensen <bs@××××.dk> wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Uhm, shouldn't metacity be masked for now? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Is has some dependancies that are masked. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Well, people who -want- metacity ( you know, you can install it without |
| 10 |
Gnome2 ) should know what they are after, and to have it masked then |
| 11 |
would be "not fun", besides, the only reason gtk+ 2 is masked is all the |
| 12 |
packages in portage that depend on the wrong versions of gtk+ .. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
//Spider |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
begin .signature |
| 21 |
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
| 22 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 23 |
end |
Archives