| 1 |
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 01:21:55AM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: |
| 2 |
> 2011-09-15 09:55:08 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a): |
| 3 |
> > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:35:21 +0200 |
| 4 |
> > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > Could you point me to at least a single program not supporting dots |
| 6 |
> > > in useflags? My quick check shows that all PMs handle them well, quse |
| 7 |
> > > and euse as well. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Hrm, it's rather disappointing that they're accepted everywhere. That |
| 10 |
> > really shouldn't happen... My excuse for Paludis is that I never quite |
| 11 |
> > got around to passing in additional flags to validation of names, and |
| 12 |
> > dots are legal in exheres-0 |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> There is no reason for Gentoo to be worse than Exherbo and not allow dots in USE flags. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Seriously Arfrever, drop the rhetoric here, and go fix the profile |
| 17 |
compatibility issue. Everytime you bring up dot's in use, you ignore |
| 18 |
compatibility, and every damn time it gets brought up I keep having |
| 19 |
to repeat this. It's not productive and this has repeated for at |
| 20 |
least a year now. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
People who want this need to sort the compat issue rather than |
| 23 |
sticking their heads in the sand. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
~brian |
Archives