| 1 |
On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 06:26, Sven Blumenstein wrote: |
| 2 |
> Should we drop the arm arch? |
| 3 |
[...] |
| 4 |
> - afaik we have no arm developer as they all went to zynot |
| 5 |
> - a great amount of DEPEND.bad archs are caused by [~]arm keyworded packages |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
If needed, go ahead an remove the arm keywords; the stuff in portage is |
| 8 |
untested on ARM and probably in a lot of cases, its only around since |
| 9 |
people propagate ~arm when they bump a package. The embedded team in |
| 10 |
the future will be maintaining ARM, but we're not at that point yet. |
| 11 |
We're going to have to go through and test and re-keyword stuff anyway. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Chris PeBenito |
| 15 |
<pebenito@g.o> |
| 16 |
Developer, |
| 17 |
Hardened Gentoo Linux |
| 18 |
Embedded Gentoo Linux |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE6AF9243 |
| 21 |
Key fingerprint = B0E6 877A 883F A57A 8E6A CB00 BC8E E42D E6AF 9243 |
Archives