| 1 |
So... profile.d have future on Gentoo? If yes, any idea on when this |
| 2 |
will become part of baselayout. Please, I'm not compelling... just |
| 3 |
curious. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On 7/18/05, Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 7 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 10 |
> | On Monday 18 July 2005 07:47 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 11 |
> | |
| 12 |
> |>Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 13 |
> |>| can we get you to actively remove the file then ? or move it into the |
| 14 |
> |> |
| 15 |
> |>docs |
| 16 |
> |> |
| 17 |
> |>| dir as like an example file, xprint.profile.d |
| 18 |
> |> |
| 19 |
> |>OK, all the ebuilds are putting them as docs now. If anyone actually |
| 20 |
> |>uses xprint and it breaks, let me know. |
| 21 |
> | |
| 22 |
> | |
| 23 |
> | i dont see how it would seeing as how nothing uses profile.d :) |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> You wouldn't believe the weird crap that goes on with xprint. There |
| 26 |
> could be another file somewhere else that sources it and relies on it, |
| 27 |
> or something else even stranger. |
| 28 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> iD8DBQFC3ETvXVaO67S1rtsRArA7AJ9bpoVd4oOx7uXoaYgeiMIKvuRQ6gCg3XWM |
| 32 |
> QXan/3t0KPS63DdDXhUhNeI= |
| 33 |
> =nFS0 |
| 34 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 35 |
> -- |
| 36 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives