1 |
Hi all, |
2 |
|
3 |
I post a log of what Hallski and I have been talking about on irc, |
4 |
please add you comments. |
5 |
|
6 |
<Bevin> what did you already imagine in terms of GUI tools for gentoo? |
7 |
installer, package manager, admin tools, ... ? |
8 |
<Hallski> not much really, the problem for packagemanager and admin |
9 |
tools would be which toolkit (or mulitple) |
10 |
<Hallski> about the installer I would really like to have it so that |
11 |
users see what happends and take an active part in it |
12 |
<Hallski> since it's very educating |
13 |
<Hallski> *puh* |
14 |
<Bevin> that's also how I see the installer, more like a guide with |
15 |
blanks to fill in and commandlines to choose from, not something that |
16 |
tries to detect and do everything automatically |
17 |
<Hallski> yes |
18 |
<Hallski> well, some kind of hardware detection would be nice though |
19 |
<Bevin> I saw this kinda like a frame based approach, left frame with |
20 |
details about the current step and required data with links to |
21 |
alternative paths |
22 |
<Hallski> that takes you through setting the different parts up |
23 |
<Bevin> right frame almost exactly as a normal shell, but i which |
24 |
commands get auto-pasted from the left frame |
25 |
<Bevin> didn't the new developer was going to work on auto-detection |
26 |
of hadrware |
27 |
<Hallski> yes, I think it would be rather nice to have that, so it can |
28 |
autoinsert commands |
29 |
<Hallski> oh, nice |
30 |
<Bevin> so it's a kinda like an interactive and guiding documentation |
31 |
<Hallski> yes |
32 |
<Bevin> with no need to print out the installation manual before |
33 |
installing |
34 |
<Hallski> it could even be so easy to just have a html-browser that |
35 |
shows the installation |
36 |
<Hallski> but it would be nicer to have some more interactive aproach |
37 |
<Hallski> like, when you excecute the command in the shell-prompt it |
38 |
takes you to the next step in the guide-part |
39 |
<Hallski> wonder if that would be easy to do :) |
40 |
<Bevin> exactly my thoughts :-) |
41 |
<Hallski> you can have like Next-button |
42 |
<Bevin> or even a real website-like navigation with possible |
43 |
installation actions tat still have to be done |
44 |
<Bevin> the most important part will in fact be to write a good |
45 |
'story-board' |
46 |
<Hallski> agree |
47 |
<Bevin> where every step in clear explanantions and all 'follow-ups' |
48 |
needed |
49 |
<Hallski> yes |
50 |
<Bevin> guess I'll get onto that storyboard first then |
51 |
<Bevin> and post it to the mailinglist as soon I have a first draft |
52 |
<Hallski> yes, that would be great |
53 |
<Bevin> about the toolkit, I like to use qt for it for several reasons |
54 |
<Hallski> ok |
55 |
<Bevin> 1. everything possibly needed is available in 1 lib |
56 |
<Hallski> I don't want to hack QT but it's ok if you do it :) |
57 |
<Bevin> 2. it officially supports operating without X |
58 |
<Bevin> first however I'd like to try to make a boot cd that contains |
59 |
the qt-embedded lib and an example app, as a proff of concept |
60 |
<Bevin> do you know if drobbins has 'portagified' his build cd |
61 |
creation scripts already? |
62 |
<Hallski> well, I think I can look a little at QT, but I'd rather not |
63 |
spend to much time learning about it |
64 |
<Hallski> dunno |
65 |
<Bevin> helping out with the storyboard will be most of the work |
66 |
<Hallski> yes |