| 1 |
Peter Volkov wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jeremy Olexa ?????: |
| 3 |
>> Thomas Sachau wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > Should we depend on all system packages? Should we depend on some |
| 5 |
>> > packages, because they could be removed? If yes, which ones? Or should |
| 6 |
>> > we leave the system packages out completly? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221311 |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Please provide reasons/justifications for the proposal of removing |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Our documentation, QA team insist that we should not depend on system |
| 13 |
> packages and there are good reasons to do that. But still above bug |
| 14 |
> clearly states different. Also if we consider perl and some other |
| 15 |
> packages, they also could became target to be removed... But I'm not |
| 16 |
> going to repeat discussion we already had recently: |
| 17 |
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/54035 |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> So yes, there is ambiguity and the question is valid. But since we had |
| 20 |
> discussion recently I don't see what else we can discuss now. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
Well according to [1] it should all be done in the profiles, and [2] seems |
| 23 |
like a good way to accomplish a more effective split. Is there anything |
| 24 |
which means portage can't simply move ahead with that? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/54146 |
| 28 |
[2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/2575 |
Archives