1 |
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Ciaran McCreesh |
2 |
<ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:00:23 +0530 |
4 |
> Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
>> Then please continue with udev in package.mask and kindly stop trying |
6 |
>> to impose your workflow on the rest of the world. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Isn't the point here that the desktop / GNOME OS guys are trying to |
9 |
> impose their deep integration, tight coupling workflow upon the rest of |
10 |
> the world? |
11 |
|
12 |
So, Gentoo is about choice and empowering the user, so I think that if |
13 |
somebody wants to offer patches that allow mdev to work better without |
14 |
adversely affecting udev use then I'd encourage devs to accept those |
15 |
patches. |
16 |
|
17 |
However, if Gentoo aims to make Gnome/KDE difficult to deploy with the |
18 |
default configuration we'll be shooting ourselves in the feet. I |
19 |
think a lot more people run KDE/Gnome on Gentoo than run Gentoo with |
20 |
/usr not on root but who are unwilling to run an initramfs. |
21 |
|
22 |
Rich |