1 |
Marcus D. Hanwell posted <200505261205.40902.cryos@g.o>, excerpted |
2 |
below, on Thu, 26 May 2005 12:05:36 +0100: |
3 |
|
4 |
> It seems that this has already been answered, but the KDE bug contains |
5 |
> some more of the detail. It looks like KDE 3.5/4 is the target for getting |
6 |
> proper visibility support. We haven't taken this decision lightly, and I |
7 |
> believe it is the best option we have for a stable desktop. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> KDE/QT 4 should have much improved visibility support, and I will be |
10 |
> testing them once it is workable and I have a little spare time |
11 |
|
12 |
Yes, I'm pretty much resigned to having to wait until kde4 for proper gcc4 |
13 |
support, but am /really/ looking forward to that! |
14 |
|
15 |
BTW, it's a bit off topic for this thread, but if there's someplace you |
16 |
could point me to with updated info on what's happening to arts and/or |
17 |
what's going to be replacing it in kde4, I know quite a number of folks |
18 |
that are interested. It seems I knew more than most when the topic came |
19 |
up in at least two groups (the amd64 list, and the local *ix group here at |
20 |
Cox), but my info is now severely outdated, since most of it is from last |
21 |
year's aKademy coverage and the like, when the only thing really settled |
22 |
was that 3.4 would continue to use ARTS and they would look at a |
23 |
replacement for 4.0. Now that 4.0 is getting closer, one would hope the |
24 |
kde4 sound question has been resolved rather more concretely than that, |
25 |
and as I said, I know a lot of folks (certainly myself included) that will |
26 |
be interested in learning more about whatever has been concluded. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
30 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
31 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
32 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |