Archives
Archives
| From: | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | ||
| Date: | Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:34:36 | ||
| Message-Id: | robbat2-20120601T163252-365612100Z@orbis-terrarum.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by William Hubbs |
||
| 1 | On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 10:45:48AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 | > Overlays are completely separate repositories. There is nothing stopping |
| 3 | > an overlay from using git right now even if the main tree isn't using |
| 4 | > git. They just work in their git repositories until they are ready to |
| 5 | > commit something to the main tree, then they move the changes to the |
| 6 | > main tree. |
| 7 | What about overlay repositories that elect to be a branch of the main |
| 8 | tree via git? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Do we call that forbidden usage? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 14 | Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
| 15 | E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 16 | GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |