1 |
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 20:23, Roman Gaufman wrote: |
2 |
> err, DO_NOT_COMPILE="kmail" in /etc/make.conf does just that, and |
3 |
> supports every package or even service KDE has to offer. Feel free to |
4 |
> not compile ksmserver or kinit as well -- this will break things, but |
5 |
> the fact is, gentooists always had the possibility to do this! |
6 |
> |
7 |
> What exactly do you propose here? -- do you actually propose gentoo |
8 |
> developers should split the metapackages into close to 100 ebuilds? -- |
9 |
|
10 |
I'm not proposing anything. I'm announcing the fact that I and another Gentoo |
11 |
developer (motaboy) have actually split the monolithic ebuilds into well over |
12 |
300 new packages. |
13 |
|
14 |
> what gain over DO_NOT_COMPILE does this give? |
15 |
|
16 |
It allows portage to manage interdependencies and, in fact, everything else it |
17 |
manages. Heavy use of DO_NOT_COMPILE, such as emerging only kmail + its deps |
18 |
from all of kdepim (of course each user has to figure out for himself what |
19 |
those deps are, first), is more or less equivalent to linux from scratch. |
20 |
It'd be manual building, except portage will think it knows what is |
21 |
installed, and will be wrong. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Dan Armak |
25 |
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) |
26 |
Matan, Israel |
27 |
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key |
28 |
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951 |