Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stability of /sys api
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 04:09:06
Message-Id: CAO38tUqz3ZF-Tn-rk1tzRZ8MTHNOd5AWGC-6DH2qKCCZigY-3A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stability of /sys api by Walter Dnes
On 16 May 2012 05:21, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:44:59AM +0200, Stelian Ionescu wrote >> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 18:38 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: >> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:03AM -0700, Greg KH wrote >> > > What specifically is your objection to udev today?  Is it doing things >> > > you don't like?  Too big?  Something else? >> > >> >   Today, it requires an initramfs if /usr is not physically on /.  That >> > is due in large part to the fact that it has been rolled into the >> > systemd tarball, and inherited some of systemd's code and limitations, >> > despite the fact that udev is still a separate binary. >> >> This is absolutely and definitely false. Where did you hear such >> nonsense ? > >  1) Did you sleep through the /usr and initramfs flamewars? > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
You seem to have missed the bit that this has nothing at all to do with systemd. -- Arun Raghavan http://arunraghavan.net/ (Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stability of /sys api Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>