Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stability of /sys api
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 04:09:06
Message-Id: CAO38tUqz3ZF-Tn-rk1tzRZ8MTHNOd5AWGC-6DH2qKCCZigY-3A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stability of /sys api by Walter Dnes
1 On 16 May 2012 05:21, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote:
2 > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:44:59AM +0200, Stelian Ionescu wrote
3 >> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 18:38 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
4 >> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:03AM -0700, Greg KH wrote
5 >> > > What specifically is your objection to udev today?  Is it doing things
6 >> > > you don't like?  Too big?  Something else?
7 >> >
8 >> >   Today, it requires an initramfs if /usr is not physically on /.  That
9 >> > is due in large part to the fact that it has been rolled into the
10 >> > systemd tarball, and inherited some of systemd's code and limitations,
11 >> > despite the fact that udev is still a separate binary.
12 >>
13 >> This is absolutely and definitely false. Where did you hear such
14 >> nonsense ?
15 >
16 >  1) Did you sleep through the /usr and initramfs flamewars?
17 > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
18
19 You seem to have missed the bit that this has nothing at all to do with systemd.
20
21 --
22 Arun Raghavan
23 http://arunraghavan.net/
24 (Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stability of /sys api Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>