| 1 |
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> No, there isn't anything traumatic. The only thing systemd folks are |
| 3 |
> doing is nicely asking devs to include systemd unit files whenever |
| 4 |
> necessary or use the eclass whenever upstream supplies those files. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> In other words, some devs just found themselves a scapegoat. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
++ |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I'm astonished by the large amount of misinformation that is being |
| 12 |
spread around about systemd. If this originated on the gentoo-user |
| 13 |
mailing list, I'm disappointed that Gentoo users wouldn't do some |
| 14 |
basic research. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I kind of expect this kind of trigger-happy FUD from websites like |
| 17 |
omgubuntu, but surely Gentoo folk are more mature. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
~Nirbheek Chauhan |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team |
Archives