1 |
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Since most of us want "clean cut" solution so i will close bug #333699 as |
3 |
> WONTFIX |
4 |
|
5 |
Along these lines, I'm looking at 333531 (the git migration tracker), |
6 |
and it seems like there isn't actually much to do: |
7 |
|
8 |
333685 - Seems like no action, and not sure how critical |
9 |
333687 - while the bug is still open, as far as I can tell it seems |
10 |
good enough to me to move forward |
11 |
333697 - ditto |
12 |
333701 - paused since there are other tasks to do first, though it |
13 |
seems to me that little remains |
14 |
|
15 |
333705 - not sure how critical this actually is - do we care if in |
16 |
some obscure case history is lost? Nothing says that we have to |
17 |
completely destroy the old cvs repo. Maybe we should just do a mock |
18 |
migration now and post copies of the before/after somewhere public and |
19 |
let people have at them. |
20 |
|
21 |
333709 - seems like there is legitimate work to be done here, but |
22 |
again nothing that big |
23 |
|
24 |
So, what is the big issue? Is there something not being tracked, or |
25 |
is one of those items a lot harder than it looks? |
26 |
|
27 |
Rich |