| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 11:12:27 +0200
|
| 5 |
"Piotr Jaroszyński" <peper@g.o> wrote:
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Hello, |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> looks like every nominee wants the council to be more technical so I |
| 10 |
> have a few technical questions for you: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> 1. GLEP54 |
| 13 |
> 2. GLEP55 |
| 14 |
> 3. Most wanted changes in future EAPIs |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> [1] - http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0054.html |
| 17 |
> [2] - http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0055.html |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> -- |
| 20 |
> Best Regards, |
| 21 |
> Piotr Jaroszyński |
| 22 |
> [Error decoding BASE64] |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Sorry to disappoint you. If you get me on council, I'm going to ask for
|
| 25 |
a recommendation and follow it unless it looks ridiculous. For the
|
| 26 |
GLEPs you mentioned, unless someone came forward otherwise, I'd approve
|
| 27 |
them out of hand. As for future EAPIs, that is not a council matter
|
| 28 |
that I can see. Why on earth can't that be done at the level of those
|
| 29 |
who care? I.e., people who implement package managers or want EAPIs.
|
| 30 |
It seems to me all we want is consistency, and council's job is to put
|
| 31 |
package manager people into a room and tell them not to come out until
|
| 32 |
they agree on something. If I'm a councilor, I really don't care what
|
| 33 |
that is.
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I'll listen to what you want for future EAPIs, but I don't think it's
|
| 36 |
council's job to decide.
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Regards,
|
| 39 |
Ferris
|
| 40 |
- --
|
| 41 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
|
| 42 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel, Userrel, Trustees)
|
| 43 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 44 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkhLqJMACgkQQa6M3+I///frwQCg3SmJMu9K9x3hjpx0jcc0tOBy
|
| 47 |
YpIAn2DS+YeYw016hoebhIyLKtbu80tE
|
| 48 |
=qDAl
|
| 49 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 50 |
éí¢‡^¾X¬¶È žÚ(¢¸&j)bž b² |
Archives