1 |
Am Sonntag, 24. März 2013, 10:05:54 schrieb Duncan: |
2 |
> Thus definitely ++. |
3 |
> |
4 |
> The one big concern I have is that in our approach to the srcd folks we |
5 |
> make clear we're *NOT* attempting to take over their project. That's the |
6 |
> sensitivity I see with the co-branded idea. I'd actually prefer that we |
7 |
> NOT do a co-branded thing, unless the srcd folks suggest it (this assumes |
8 |
> yngwin's not srcd upstream and thus did indeed just make that offer, I |
9 |
> don't know), and simply cooperate a bit more with them, filing bugs (and |
10 |
> as their upstream fixing them in gentoo where possible), helping to fix |
11 |
> the ppp networking config issues already mentioned, etc, while simply |
12 |
> using their releases as they are. If we want to point out that they're a |
13 |
> gentoo-based project that we happily endorse in our handbook links to |
14 |
> them, great, but I'm afraid a co-branded suggestion from our side might |
15 |
> come across as an attempt to take over, and that'd benefit absolutely no |
16 |
> one! |
17 |
|
18 |
+1 |
19 |
|
20 |
They are doing a great job, and we should acknowledge that, talk to them but |
21 |
not interfere. |
22 |
|
23 |
First of all this is a decision of our own policy. (Do we want to officially |
24 |
recommend a third-party tool in our documentation?) |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
|
28 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
29 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
30 |
dilfridge@g.o |
31 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |