| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 00:27, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
| 2 |
<phajdan.jr@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Okay, I think this is pretty cool and we should find it a new home in |
| 4 |
> the Gentoo infrastructure. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I was thinking about http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/ with the repo at |
| 7 |
> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/qa-scripts.git;a=summary |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I can act as a proxy committer and reviewer for that code. Could you |
| 10 |
> break it up into some smaller parts (preferably backend first) and send |
| 11 |
> to me for review (if you're interested)? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> How long does it take to generate the reports? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
+1 I think it would be good to run this on Gentoo infra, and I |
| 16 |
wouldn't mind helping out. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Bikeshedding: not sure "reports" is the best name for this, as reports |
| 19 |
implies something more static? Also not sure how much it has to do |
| 20 |
with QA. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
How much of it constitutes the backend, in your opinion? It seems |
| 23 |
there are two parts, right now: |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
1. euscan script, to find new versions for a single package |
| 26 |
2. the django www app, including storage for the version data |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
IMO it would be nice to have a somewhat generic REST-style service |
| 29 |
exposing the data, and build a simple UI on top of that. In |
| 30 |
particular, I have different ideas about what the UI should look like, |
| 31 |
so it would be nice if different people could experiment (and/or |
| 32 |
integrate in other services like znurt.org). |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Cheers, |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Dirkjan |
Archives