| 1 |
Ulrich Mueller posted on Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:59:45 +0100 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Real examples would be issues like bugs 83877 [1] or 263387 [2]. Nothing |
| 4 |
> that could be easily dismissed or worked around. Both issues are fixed |
| 5 |
> with Portage since a long time. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Thanks. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> I don't know of any example where non-preservation of nanosecond |
| 10 |
> timestamps would cause problems. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
That's really what I was hoping for, a bug where the nanosecond times |
| 13 |
thing made a difference. But Ciaran does have a point about such things |
| 14 |
being potentially closed as WORKSFORME or the like, as I've seen that in |
| 15 |
other cases, see my just earlier post. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 19 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 20 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives