Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] avoiding urgent stabilizations
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:12:43
Message-Id: 20110225175310.GG22774@nibiru.local
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] avoiding urgent stabilizations by Ed W
* Ed W <lists@××××××××××.com> schrieb:

> I maintain a, likely much smaller, number of VMs using linux vservers. > The approach here is to almost cut each machine down to a chroot that > runs only one (or thereabouts) interesting service.
I'm working in a similar way: my dedicated boxes are VM hosts (currently ovz, but later lguest or lxc), each of them running only specific services (eg. one for nginx-based front proxy, several other for backend webservers, RDBMs'es, mailservers, etc). But, for me, even a trimmed-down Gentoo is still too large (has to contain the whole base packages, from portage to toolchain, includes, etc). I'd prefer having only the essential runtime stuff within the containers. For this we need a different approach (strictly separating build and production environments). Binary distros (eg. Debian) might be one option, but they're lacking the configurability and mostly are still too large. So I'm going a different route using my own buildsystem - called Briegel - which originally was designed for embedded/small-device targets. For now I didn't have the spare time to port all the packages required for complete server systems (most of it is making them all cleanly crosscompile'able, as this is a fundamental concept of Briegel). But maybe you'd like to join in and try it :)
> Using something like git would probably be perfect
I'm using git'ed portage trees in production for several month now (I sometimes had to touch some eclasses, which _IMHO_ doesn't via overlays). The repos are configured to rebase on pull and everything runs automatically :)
> The still missing step is configuration management across the machine > types, eg I want to upgrade all my "Apache-WWW" class machines and merge > in all changes in /etc in a certain way... At the moment I just run > dispatch-conf across all machines, but it can be quite boring merging 20 > instances of sshd.conf... Seems like Puppet/Chef could be a solution > here, but the step up and investment to make it work seems pretty large?
I haven't used puppet yet, but several collegues have made good experiences with it. If you're maintaining dozens of very similar systems (mine tend to be very different from each other), it likely worth investigating.
> It does appear like managing large numbers of virtual machines is one > are that gentoo could score very well? Interested to see any chatter on > how others solve this problem, or any general advocacy? Probably we > should start a new thread though...
I'm not sure if Gentoo really is the right distro for that purpose, as it's targeted to very different systems (i.g. Gentoo boxes are expected to be quite unique, beginning with different per-package useflags, even down to cflags, etc). But it might still be a good basis for building specific system images (let's call them stage5 ;-)) An setup for 100 equal webserver vm's could look like this: * run a normal Gentoo vm (tailored for the webserver appliance), where do you do regular updates (emerge, revdep-rebuild, etc, etc) * from time to time take a snapshot, strip off the buildtime-only stuff (hmm, could turn out to be a bit tricky ;-o) * this stripped snapshot now goes into testing vm's * when approved, the individual production vm's are switched over to the new image (maybe using some mount magic, unionfs, etc) At this point I've got a question for to the other folks here: emerge has an --root option which allows to (un)merge in a separate system image. So it should be possible to unmerge a lot of system packages which are just required for updating/building (even portage itself), but this still will be manual - what about dependency handling ? Is there some way to drop at least parts of the standard system set, so eg. portage, python, gcc, etc, etc get unmerged by --depclean if nobody else (in world set) doesn't explicitly require them ? cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt@×××××.de mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] avoiding urgent stabilizations Ed W <lists@××××××××××.com>