1 |
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:46:10 +0200 |
2 |
Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> 0007 - I placed it into the conditionals to be clear what is |
5 |
> happening, what if there will be added another if without the push... |
6 |
|
7 |
Well, that part is not important, I can rollback it. It was mostly for |
8 |
the repack/prune part. |
9 |
|
10 |
> 0010 - 0011 - I was serious with getting crashes on some packages with |
11 |
> this approach (suprisingly i first really tried to make the eclass |
12 |
> backcompat as much as possible), did you get anyone else to ack this |
13 |
> thing? FWIW it is like fetching new packages, I can agree that |
14 |
> dowloading whole qt or libreoffice can make someone sad, but it is |
15 |
> just few megs compared to the rest of your weekly world update. -> You |
16 |
> are introducing possibility to nicely fail without any simple |
17 |
> resolution why for almost no benefit. |
18 |
|
19 |
Even with 'git clone' approach? Could you point me to a particular test |
20 |
case or bug describing this thoroughly? |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Best regards, |
24 |
Michał Górny |