| 1 |
On 7/20/07, Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Eric Polino wrote: |
| 3 |
> > If this is truly a problem, then I think the negative USE flags might |
| 4 |
> > be the better solution then. This would allow users the ability to |
| 5 |
> > disable potential insecure features. But really, I doubt security is |
| 6 |
> > an issue here. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> The negative (or no*) USE flags are generally considered a "bad thing". They're |
| 9 |
> "icky". |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I know and understand that. Though we still have to consider them as |
| 12 |
a possible solution to this problem. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> -- |
| 15 |
> Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ |
| 16 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer Catalyst/Installer + x86 release coordinator |
| 17 |
> -- |
| 18 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
http://aluink.blogspot.com |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
"...indexable arrays, which may be thought of as functions whose |
| 28 |
domains are isomorphic to contiguous subsets of the integers." |
| 29 |
--Haskell 98 Library Report |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives