| 1 |
Hallski wrote: [Tue Sep 11 2001, 09:38:05AM EDT] |
| 2 |
> m_ 2001-09-10 klockan 15.04 skrev Aron Griffis: |
| 3 |
> > I'm considering a change and would like feedback on it. Currently there |
| 4 |
> > are two ebuilds for vim. The first is sys-apps/vim-nogui, the second is |
| 5 |
> > app-editors/vim-gtk. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > I would like to collapse these into a single ebuild called |
| 8 |
> > app-editors/vim. This ebuild fulfills the following goals: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I think this is a good idea _if_ when building with USE=gtk+ for example |
| 11 |
> the non-gui-version is built too. I mean, just because you like a |
| 12 |
> gui-version sometimes you probably also want a non-gui (to use in a |
| 13 |
> term/console). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Indeed, that is what it does. :-) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> If this is true I think this is the correct way, there are other |
| 18 |
> packages that I'd like to see merged too. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Great! Thanks. I'll probably go ahead and commit this eventually. |
| 21 |
I would like to know a couple things to be able to execute this well, |
| 22 |
though: |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
(1) What ramifications are there to sys-apps/vim-nogui disappearing? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
(2) Is there any method by which app-editors/vim can be marked as |
| 27 |
upgrading both sys-apps/vim-nogui and app-editors/vim-gtk? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Thanks, |
| 30 |
Aron |
Archives