Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds | ||
| Date: | Sun, 18 Mar 2012 11:19:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_mm2Nz3kqHSyU8=GFAddVdnYbVDE8-L-KykAkBPxWeN_g@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds by Ralph Sennhauser |
||
| 1 | On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Ralph Sennhauser <sera@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > The ebuild extensions for GLEP 55 |
| 3 | > would likely always be ebuild-<integer> as integers are reserved for |
| 4 | > future use by Gentoo. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Looking at GLEP 55 the proposal was ebuild-<EAPI> - not |
| 7 | ebuild-<integer>. I don't believe there is any restriction that EAPIs |
| 8 | be integers or incremental in nature. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Don't mean to nitpick, but perhaps not all realize this... |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Rich |